Published Date : 2021-10-13
Published Date : 2021-10-13
Updated On : 2022-03-05
Pages : 166
Thelansis’s “Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Market Outlook, Epidemiology, Competitive Landscape, and Market Forecast Report – 2021 To 2032" covers disease overview, epidemiology, drug utilization, prescription share analysis, competitive landscape, clinical practice, regulatory landscape, patient share, market uptake, market forecast, and key market insights under the potential Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) treatment modalities options for eight major markets (USA, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, UK, Japan, and China).
Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) is a primary, progressive corneal endothelial disorder that causes corneal edema and vision loss. The first signs of FED usually appear between the fifth and seventh decades of life. They are characterized by progressive accumulation of focal excrescences, termed “guttae,” and thickening of Descemet’s membrane, a collagen-rich layer secreted by endothelial cells. Endothelial cell density and functionality as the cornea's "pump" eventually decline, resulting in vision-threatening corneal edema. Although the presence of corneal guttae is not pathognomonic for FED, the development of stromal edema does. Symptoms include visual blurring, most notably in the morning, and stromal and epithelial edema caused by relatively low tear film osmolality. FED has been linked to mutations in collagen VIII, a vital component of the Descemet's membrane secreted by endothelial cells. FED is divided into four stages, beginning with early signs of guttae formation and progressing to end-stage subepithelial scarring. The biomicroscopic examination is used to diagnose; other modalities, such as corneal pachymetry, confocal microscopy, and specular microscopy, can be used in conjunction.
North America- the United States and Canada
Europe- EU5 (Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom)
Other countries- Japan & China
This section of the study covers country-specific current clinical practice, the standard of care, and significant limitations around addressing the unmet needs. Retrospective analysis and bench-marking of clinical study outcomes are presented in terms of Pre-treatment & post-treatment clinical and demographic patient characteristics. Essentially, this section will cover the evolution of the current competitive landscape and its impact on the future treatment paradigm.
KOLs across 8 MM markets from the center of Excellence/ Public/ Private hospitals participated in the study. Insights around current treatment landscape, epidemiology, clinical characteristics, future treatment paradigm, and Unmet needs
- Data Inputs with sourcing
- Market Event and Product Event
- Country-specific Forecast Model
- Market uptake and patient share uptake
- Attribute Analysis
- Analog Analysis
- Disease burden and pricing scenario
- Summary and Insights
Optimization of cash flow/ revenue flow concerning all fixed and variable investments throughout the product development process. The rate of return on an investment is a critical indicator to ensure the profitability and break-even of the project.
The competitive landscape includes country-specific approved as well as pipeline therapies. Any asset/product-specific designation or review such as Orphan drug designation, Fast track, Priority Review, Breakthrough Therapy Designation, Rare Pediatric Disease Designation, and Accelerated Approval are tracked and supplemented with analyst commentary.
Detailed clinical trial data analysis and critical product positioning include trial design, primary outcomes, secondary outcomes, dosing and schedules, inclusion and exclusion criteria, recruitment status and essentially covers the reported adverse events. Majorly the trial analysis helps determine the potential of the critical assets and their probable filing and launch date.
This report presents the most important clinical unmet needs in the treatment, according to Thelansis research and analysis. Other essential unmet needs identified through our study include decreased cost burden on patients, improved administration convenience, and improved patient compliance.
S. no | Asset | Company | Stage |
1 | Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution | Price Vision Group | Phase 3 |
2 | STN1010904 ophthalmic suspension | Santen Inc. | Phase 2 |
3 | K-321 Solution | Kowa Research Institute, Inc. | Phase 2 |
4 | TTHX1114(NM141) | Trefoil Therapeutics, Inc. | Phase 2 |
5 | Netarsudil Ophthalmic | Aerie Pharmaceuticals | Phase 2 |
6 | EO2002 | Emmecell | Phase 1 |
7 | Elamipretide | Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc. | Phase 2 |
KOLs across 8 MM markets from the center of Excellence/ Public/ Private hospitals participated in the study. Insights around current treatment landscape, epidemiology, clinical characteristics, future treatment paradigm, and Unmet needs.
COUNTRY | No. Of KOLs |
USA | 17 |
GERMANY | 4 |
UK | 5 |
SPAIN | 4 |
FRANCE | 4 |
ITALY | 4 |
JAPAN | 5 |
CHINA | 5 |
Data Inputs with sourcing, Market Event, Product Event, Country specific Forecast Model, Market uptake and patient share uptake, Attribute Analysis, Analog Analysis, Disease burden, and pricing scenario, Summary, and Insights.
1. Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) – Key Findings Summary |
1.1. Clinical findings |
1.1.1. Disease overview |
1.1.2. Therapeutic practices |
1.1.3. Future outlook |
1.2. Commercial findings |
1.2.1. Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) market scenario 2021 |
1.2.2. Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) market scenario 2025 |
1.2.3. Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) market scenario 2032 |
2. Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Overview |
2.1. Disease Introduction |
2.2. Pathophysiology |
2.3. Signs and Symptoms |
2.4. Risk Factors |
2.5. Etiology |
2.6. Classification |
2.7. Pathogenesis |
2.8. Diagnosis |
2.9. Complications |
2.10. Treatment Algorithm |
2.10.1. Treatment in US (guidelines) |
2.10.2. Treatment in EU-5 (guidelines) |
2.10.3. Treatment in Japan (guidelines) |
2.10.4. Treatment in China (guidelines) |
2.11. Treatment Goals for Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) |
2.12. Referral Patterns |
2.12.1. Referral Scenario in US |
2.12.2. Referral Scenario in EU-5 |
2.12.3. Referral Scenario in Japan |
2.12.4. Referral Scenario in China |
2.13. Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Prognosis |
2.14. Healthcare burden |
2.14.1. Healthcare burden in US |
2.14.2. Healthcare burden in EU-5 |
2.14.3. Healthcare burden in Japan |
2.14.4. Healthcare burden in China |
2.15. Unmet Needs in Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) management |
2.16. Market Opportunity for Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) |
2.17. KOL Comments on current and upcoming/expected treatment practices in Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) |
3. Epidemiology |
3.1. Epidemiology Overview |
3.2. Epidemiology by Geography |
3.2.1. Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Epidemiology in US (2021-2032) |
3.2.1.1. Incidence of Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) |
3.2.1.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.1.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.1.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.2. Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Epidemiology in EU-5 (2021-2032) |
3.2.2.1. Incidence of Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) |
3.2.2.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.2.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.2.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.3. Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Epidemiology in Japan (2021-2032) |
3.2.3.1. Incidence of Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) |
3.2.3.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.3.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.3.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.4. Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Epidemiology in China (2021-2032) |
3.2.4.1. Incidence of Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) |
3.2.4.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.4.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.4.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.3. Epidemiology Trends (World-wide) |
4. Market Outlook |
4.1. US Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.1.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.1.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.1.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.1.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.1.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.1.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.2. UK Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.2.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.2.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.2.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.2.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.2.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.2.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.3. France Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.3.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.3.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.3.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.3.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.3.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.3.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.4. Germany Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.4.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.4.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.4.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.4.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.4.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.4.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.5. Italy Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.5.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.5.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.5.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.5.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.5.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.5.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.6. Spain Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.6.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.6.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.6.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.6.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.6.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.6.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.7. Japan Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.7.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.7.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.7.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.7.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.7.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.7.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.8. China Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.8.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.8.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.8.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.8.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.8.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.8.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.9. Key Expected Milestones (world-wide) Impacting the Market |
5. Competitive Landscape |
5.1. Pipeline Therapies Overview |
5.1.1. Phase III Therapies |
5.1.1.1. Current Status |
5.1.1.2. Trial details, results |
5.1.1.3. Approval Timeline |
5.1.1.4. Likelihood of approval |
5.1.1.5. Expected Product Positioning |
5.1.1.2. All other Phase III Therapies ….. |
5.1.1.3. Attribute Analysis of Phase III molecules |
5.1.2. Phase II and Phase I/II Therapies |
5.1.2.1. Current Status |
5.1.2.2. Trial details, results |
5.1.2.3. Approval Timelines |
5.1.3. List of active Pre-clinical Therapies |
5.1.3.1. Status in Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) |
5.1.3.2. Company positioning |
5.1.3.2. All other pre-clinical therapies |
5.1.4. List of Inactive/discontinued assets |
5.1.4.1. Business impact of discontinuations on current pipeline |
5.1.5. Potential winners from Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Pipeline |
5.1.5.1. Potential Blockbusters across the pipeline |
6. Regulatory/Approval Scenario |
6.1. Regulatory/Approval Framework in US |
6.1.1. Policy Framework |
6.1.2. Payer Expectations |
6.2. Regulatory/Approval Framework in UK |
6.2.1. Policy Framework |
6.2.2. Payer Expectations |
6.3. Regulatory/Approval Framework in France |
6.3.1. Policy Framework |
6.3.2. Payer Expectations |
6.4. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Germany |
6.4.1. Policy Framework |
6.4.2. Payer Expectations |
6.5. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Italy |
6.5.1. Policy Framework |
6.5.2. Payer Expectations |
6.6. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Spain |
6.6.1. Policy Framework |
6.6.2. Payer Expectations |
6.7. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Japan |
6.7.1. Policy Framework |
6.7.2. Payer Expectations |
6.8. Regulatory/Approval Framework in China |
6.8.1. Policy Framework |
6.8.2. Payer Expectations |
7. Clinical Trial Assessment – Current and Future Paradigm |
7.1. Distribution of Primary Endpoints across trials |
7.2. Distribution of Secondary Endpoints across trials |
7.3. Evolution and acceptance of surrogate endpoints |
7.4. Key Investigator initiated trials |
7.5. Attrition analysis |
7.5.1. Suspended/Discontinued Assets |
7.5.2. Failed Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.5.3. Terminated Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.5.4. Withdrawn Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.6. Trial enrollment scenario and challenges |
7.7. Clinical Trial Guidance (across geographies) |
8. Thelansis Commentary |
8.1. Key Unmet needs in Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) |
8.2. Possible Best-case Clinical Trial Strategies |
8.3. Possible Best Case Targeted Product Profile (TPP) |
8.4. Possible Best-case Market positioning strategies |
8.5. Possible Best-case Market Access Strategies |
8.6. Possible Best-case LCM Strategies |
8.7. Overall View on Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) Market in Dollar Value |
9. Report Methodology |
9.1. Secondary research |
9.2. Primary research |
9.3. Data collation |
9.4. Insight Generation |
10. About Thelansis |
10.1. Our Capabilities |
10.2. Our Services |
10.3. Our Contacts |
10.4. Disclaimer |