Published Date : 2021-11-30
Published Date : 2021-11-30
Updated On : 2023-08-25
Pages : 160
Thelansis’s “Burkitt Lymphoma Market Outlook, Epidemiology, Competitive Landscape, and Market Forecast Report – 2021 To 2032" covers disease overview, epidemiology, drug utilization, prescription share analysis, competitive landscape, clinical practice, regulatory landscape, patient share, market uptake, market forecast, and key market insights under the potential Burkitt Lymphoma treatment modalities options for eight major markets (USA, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, UK, Japan, and China).
Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is a highly aggressive non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma, often associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and chromosomal translocations leading to the overexpression of the oncogene C-MYC. In most cases, Burkitt lymphoma exhibits a specific translocation, t(8;14)(q24;q32), which brings the MYC/c-Myc gene (8q24) in close proximity to the heavy chain immunoglobulin gene (14q32). In rarer instances, this translocation affects chromosome 2 (kappa chain in immunoglobulins) or 22 (lambda chain in immunoglobulins). Burkitt lymphoma can be categorized into three clinical groups: endemic, sporadic, and immunodeficiency-related. The endemic form is associated with malaria and EBV, while the immunodeficiency-related variant is linked to HIV and organ transplantation to a lesser extent. Children generally have a favorable prognosis with intensive chemotherapy treatment, but the outlook for adults is less promising. Pediatric patients are typically staged using the St. Jude staging system, while the Ann Arbor and Murphy staging systems are more commonly employed for adults. The Ann Arbor system considers a patient's symptoms. In contrast, the Murphy staging system is preferred for its ability to highlight extranodal disease and distinguish bone marrow involvement from central nervous system disease. The prognosis depends mainly on clinical and histopathologic staging, particularly the extent of the disease. In general, younger patients tend to have a better prognosis, possibly due to their enhanced ability to tolerate intensive chemotherapy.
North America- the United States and Canada
Europe- EU5 (Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom)
Other countries- Japan & China
This section of the study covers country-specific current clinical practice, the standard of care, and significant limitations around addressing the unmet needs. Retrospective analysis and bench-marking of clinical study outcomes are presented in terms of Pre-treatment & post-treatment clinical and demographic patient characteristics. Essentially, this section will cover the evolution of the current competitive landscape and its impact on the future treatment paradigm.
KOLs across 8 MM markets from the center of Excellence/ Public/ Private hospitals participated in the study. Insights around current treatment landscape, epidemiology, clinical characteristics, future treatment paradigm, and Unmet needs
- Data Inputs with sourcing
- Market Event and Product Event
- Country-specific Forecast Model
- Market uptake and patient share uptake
- Attribute Analysis
- Analog Analysis
- Disease burden and pricing scenario
- Summary and Insights
Optimization of cash flow/ revenue flow concerning all fixed and variable investments throughout the product development process. The rate of return on an investment is a critical indicator to ensure the profitability and break-even of the project.
The competitive landscape includes country-specific approved as well as pipeline therapies. Any asset/product-specific designation or review such as Orphan drug designation, Fast track, Priority Review, Breakthrough Therapy Designation, Rare Pediatric Disease Designation, and Accelerated Approval are tracked and supplemented with analyst commentary.
Detailed clinical trial data analysis and critical product positioning include trial design, primary outcomes, secondary outcomes, dosing and schedules, inclusion and exclusion criteria, recruitment status and essentially covers the reported adverse events. Majorly the trial analysis helps determine the potential of the critical assets and their probable filing and launch date.
This report presents the most important clinical unmet needs in the treatment, according to Thelansis research and analysis. Other essential unmet needs identified through our study include decreased cost burden on patients, improved administration convenience, and improved patient compliance.
S. no | Asset | Company | Stage |
1 | AZD3965 | AstraZeneca | Phase 1 |
2 | Brexucabtagene Autoleucel | Kite, A Gilead Company | Phase 2 |
3 | Acalabrutinib and Pembrolizumab | Acerta Pharma BV | Phase 2 |
4 | Cyclophosphamide | Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Phase 2 |
5 | IMT-009 | Immunitas Therapeutics | Phase 2 |
6 | Sepantronium Bromide | Cothera Bioscience, Inc | Phase 2 |
7 | ADCT-402 | ADC Therapeutics S.A. | Phase 1 |
8 | SGR-1505 | Schrödinger, Inc. | Phase 1 |
9 | CPX-351 | Jazz Pharmaceuticals | Phase 1 |
10 | AT9283 | Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Phase 1 |
Continued...
KOLs across 8 MM market from the center of Excellence/ Public/ Private hospitals participated in the study. Insights around current treatment landscape, epidemiology, clinical characteristics, future treatment paradigm, and Unmet needs.
COUNTRY | No. Of KOLs |
USA | 17 |
GERMANY | 4 |
UK | 4 |
SPAIN | 3 |
FRANCE | 2 |
ITALY | 3 |
JAPAN | 3 |
CHINA | 4 |
Data Inputs with sourcing, Market Event, Product Event, Country specific Forecast Model, Market uptake and patient share uptake, Attribute Analysis, Analog Analysis, Disease burden, and pricing scenario, Summary, and Insights.
1. Burkitt Lymphoma – Key Findings Summary |
1.1. Clinical findings |
1.1.1. Disease overview |
1.1.2. Therapeutic practices |
1.1.3. Future outlook |
1.2. Commercial findings |
1.2.1. Burkitt Lymphoma market scenario 2021 |
1.2.2. Burkitt Lymphoma market scenario 2025 |
1.2.3. Burkitt Lymphoma market scenario 2032 |
2. Burkitt Lymphoma Overview |
2.1. Disease Introduction |
2.2. Pathophysiology |
2.3. Signs and Symptoms |
2.4. Risk Factors |
2.5. Etiology |
2.6. Classification |
2.7. Pathogenesis |
2.8. Diagnosis |
2.9. Complications |
2.10. Treatment Algorithm |
2.10.1. Treatment in US (guidelines) |
2.10.2. Treatment in EU-5 (guidelines) |
2.10.3. Treatment in Japan (guidelines) |
2.10.4. Treatment in China (guidelines) |
2.11. Treatment Goals for Burkitt Lymphoma |
2.12. Referral Patterns |
2.12.1. Referral Scenario in US |
2.12.2. Referral Scenario in EU-5 |
2.12.3. Referral Scenario in Japan |
2.12.4. Referral Scenario in China |
2.13. Burkitt Lymphoma Prognosis |
2.14. Healthcare burden |
2.14.1. Healthcare burden in US |
2.14.2. Healthcare burden in EU-5 |
2.14.3. Healthcare burden in Japan |
2.14.4. Healthcare burden in China |
2.15. Unmet Needs in Burkitt Lymphoma management |
2.16. Market Opportunity for Burkitt Lymphoma |
2.17. KOL Comments on current and upcoming/expected treatment practices in Burkitt Lymphoma |
3. Epidemiology |
3.1. Epidemiology Overview |
3.2. Epidemiology by Geography |
3.2.1. Burkitt Lymphoma Epidemiology in US (2021-2032) |
3.2.1.1. Incidence of Burkitt Lymphoma |
3.2.1.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.1.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.1.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.2. Burkitt Lymphoma Epidemiology in EU-5 (2021-2032) |
3.2.2.1. Incidence of Burkitt Lymphoma |
3.2.2.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.2.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.2.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.3. Burkitt Lymphoma Epidemiology in Japan (2021-2032) |
3.2.3.1. Incidence of Burkitt Lymphoma |
3.2.3.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.3.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.3.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.4. Burkitt Lymphoma Epidemiology in China (2021-2032) |
3.2.4.1. Incidence of Burkitt Lymphoma |
3.2.4.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.4.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.4.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.3. Epidemiology Trends (World-wide) |
4. Market Outlook |
4.1. US Burkitt Lymphoma Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.1.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.1.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.1.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.1.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.1.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.1.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.2. UK Burkitt Lymphoma Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.2.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.2.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.2.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.2.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.2.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.2.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.3. France Burkitt Lymphoma Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.3.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.3.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.3.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.3.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.3.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.3.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.4. Germany Burkitt Lymphoma Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.4.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.4.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.4.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.4.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.4.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.4.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.5. Italy Burkitt Lymphoma Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.5.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.5.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.5.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.5.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.5.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.5.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.6. Spain Burkitt Lymphoma Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.6.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.6.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.6.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.6.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.6.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.6.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.7. Japan Burkitt Lymphoma Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.7.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.7.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.7.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.7.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.7.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.7.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.8. China Burkitt Lymphoma Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.8.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.8.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.8.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.8.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.8.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.8.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.9. Key Expected Milestones (world-wide) Impacting the Market |
5. Competitive Landscape |
5.1. Pipeline Therapies Overview |
5.1.1. Phase III Therapies |
5.1.1.1. Current Status |
5.1.1.2. Trial details, results |
5.1.1.3. Approval Timeline |
5.1.1.4. Likelihood of approval |
5.1.1.5. Expected Product Positioning |
5.1.1.2. All other Phase III Therapies ….. |
5.1.1.3. Attribute Analysis of Phase III molecules |
5.1.2. Phase II and Phase I/II Therapies |
5.1.2.1. Current Status |
5.1.2.2. Trial details, results |
5.1.2.3. Approval Timelines |
5.1.3. List of active Pre-clinical Therapies |
5.1.3.1. Status in Burkitt Lymphoma |
5.1.3.2. Company positioning |
5.1.3.2. All other pre-clinical therapies |
5.1.4. List of Inactive/discontinued assets |
5.1.4.1. Business impact of discontinuations on current pipeline |
5.1.5. Potential winners from Burkitt Lymphoma Pipeline |
5.1.5.1. Potential Blockbusters across the pipeline |
6. Regulatory/Approval Scenario |
6.1. Regulatory/Approval Framework in US |
6.1.1. Policy Framework |
6.1.2. Payer Expectations |
6.2. Regulatory/Approval Framework in UK |
6.2.1. Policy Framework |
6.2.2. Payer Expectations |
6.3. Regulatory/Approval Framework in France |
6.3.1. Policy Framework |
6.3.2. Payer Expectations |
6.4. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Germany |
6.4.1. Policy Framework |
6.4.2. Payer Expectations |
6.5. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Italy |
6.5.1. Policy Framework |
6.5.2. Payer Expectations |
6.6. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Spain |
6.6.1. Policy Framework |
6.6.2. Payer Expectations |
6.7. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Japan |
6.7.1. Policy Framework |
6.7.2. Payer Expectations |
6.8. Regulatory/Approval Framework in China |
6.8.1. Policy Framework |
6.8.2. Payer Expectations |
7. Clinical Trial Assessment – Current and Future Paradigm |
7.1. Distribution of Primary Endpoints across trials |
7.2. Distribution of Secondary Endpoints across trials |
7.3. Evolution and acceptance of surrogate endpoints |
7.4. Key Investigator initiated trials |
7.5. Attrition analysis |
7.5.1. Suspended/Discontinued Assets |
7.5.2. Failed Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.5.3. Terminated Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.5.4. Withdrawn Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.6. Trial enrollment scenario and challenges |
7.7. Clinical Trial Guidance (across geographies) |
8. Thelansis Commentary |
8.1. Key Unmet needs in Burkitt Lymphoma |
8.2. Possible Best-case Clinical Trial Strategies |
8.3. Possible Best Case Targeted Product Profile (TPP) |
8.4. Possible Best-case Market positioning strategies |
8.5. Possible Best-case Market Access Strategies |
8.6. Possible Best-case LCM Strategies |
8.7. Overall View on Burkitt Lymphoma Market in Dollar Value |
9. Report Methodology |
9.1. Secondary research |
9.2. Primary research |
9.3. Data collation |
9.4. Insight Generation |
10. About Thelansis |
10.1. Our Capabilities |
10.2. Our Services |
10.3. Our Contacts |
10.4. Disclaimer |