Published Date : 2023-08-11
Published Date : 2023-08-11
Updated On : 2024-05-31
Pages : 153
Thelansis’s “Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Market Outlook, Epidemiology, Competitive Landscape, and Market Forecast Report – 2023 To 2033" covers disease overview, epidemiology, drug utilization, prescription share analysis, competitive landscape, clinical practice, regulatory landscape, patient share, market uptake, market forecast, and key market insights under the potential Stiff-Person Syndrome treatment modalities options for eight major markets (USA, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, UK, Japan, and China).
Stiff person syndrome (SPS) encompasses a spectrum of disorders characterized by progressively increasing axial rigidity accompanied by intermittent, painful spasms. This condition predominantly affects females and may arise idiopathically or secondary to autoimmune disorders or paraneoplastic conditions, accounting for approximately 5% of cases. Variants within this syndrome include stiff limb syndrome, jerking stiff person syndrome, and progressive encephalomyelitis with rigidity and myoclonus (PERM). The clinical course of SPS is variable, often ameliorating during sleep but exacerbating with movement, sensory stimuli, or emotional stress. Patients may also experience spasms and myoclonic jerks. In SPS, anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase (anti-GAD) autoantibodies are detected in 50–90% of cases, with other associated autoantibodies, including anti-amphiphysin and anti-glycine receptors. The presence of anti-GAD antibodies is predominantly linked to autoimmune diseases such as type 1 diabetes mellitus. In contrast, anti-amphiphysin and anti-glycine receptor antibodies are frequently associated with solid tumors. Paraneoplastic SPS often involves both limbs and may be accompanied by sensory neuronopathy. Notably, anti-glycine receptor antibodies can yield false positives outside the phenotypic spectrum of SPS and PERM, as seen in conditions like optic neuritis and epilepsy. Anti-amphiphysin antibodies may also be present in PERM, marked by altered consciousness, brainstem manifestations, myoclonus, cerebellar ataxia, and diffuse rigidity. Treatment for SPS is categorized into symptomatic management and disease-modifying or immunotherapeutic approaches. Typically, these therapeutic strategies are employed in combination based on disease severity. Symptomatic treatment, the cornerstone of initial therapy, aims to reduce stiffness, rigidity, and painful muscle spasms through agents that enhance GABAergic activity, including benzodiazepines, baclofen, gabapentin, and vigabatrin. Diazepam is frequently the first-line symptomatic agent for SPS, though tolerance and dependency on benzodiazepines may develop, diminishing their effectiveness over time. Intrathecal baclofen has shown efficacy in certain patients, while other muscle relaxants such as dantrolene and tizanidine are also utilized. Additionally, the management of coexisting seizures and psychiatric comorbidities involves the use of antiepileptic and antidepressant medications, respectively. Disease-modifying therapy involves immune modulation to reduce or eliminate autoantibodies. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has demonstrated significant efficacy as an immunotherapy for SPS, providing clinical improvement for up to one year following a standard course of five sessions.
North America- the United States and Canada
Europe- EU5 (Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom)
Other countries- Japan & China
This section of the study covers country-specific current clinical practice, the standard of care, and significant limitations around addressing the unmet needs. Retrospective analysis and bench-marking of clinical study outcomes are presented in terms of Pre-treatment & post-treatment clinical and demographic patient characteristics. Essentially, this section will cover the evolution of the current competitive landscape and its impact on the future treatment paradigm.
KOLs across 8 MM markets from the center of Excellence/ Public/ Private hospitals participated in the study. Insights around current treatment landscape, epidemiology, clinical characteristics, future treatment paradigm, and Unmet needs
- Data Inputs with sourcing
- Market Event and Product Event
- Country-specific Forecast Model
- Market uptake and patient share uptake
- Attribute Analysis
- Analog Analysis
- Disease burden and pricing scenario
- Summary and Insights
Optimization of cash flow/ revenue flow concerning all fixed and variable investments throughout the product development process. The rate of return on an investment is a critical indicator to ensure the profitability and break-even of the project.
The competitive landscape includes country-specific approved as well as pipeline therapies. Any asset/product-specific designation or review such as Orphan drug designation, Fast track, Priority Review, Breakthrough Therapy Designation, Rare Pediatric Disease Designation, and Accelerated Approval are tracked and supplemented with analyst commentary.
Detailed clinical trial data analysis and critical product positioning include trial design, primary outcomes, secondary outcomes, dosing and schedules, inclusion and exclusion criteria, recruitment status and essentially covers the reported adverse events. Majorly the trial analysis helps determine the potential of the critical assets and their probable filing and launch date.
This report presents the most important clinical unmet needs in the treatment, according to Thelansis research and analysis. Other essential unmet needs identified through our study include decreased cost burden on patients, improved administration convenience, and improved patient compliance.
S. no | Asset | Company | Stage |
1 | KYV-101 | Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. | Phase 2 |
KOLs across 8 MM market from the center of Excellence/ Public/ Private hospitals participated in the study. Insights around current treatment landscape, epidemiology, clinical characteristics, future treatment paradigm, and Unmet needs.
COUNTRY | No. Of KOLs |
USA | 17 |
GERMANY | 4 |
UK | 4 |
SPAIN | 3 |
FRANCE | 2 |
ITALY | 3 |
JAPAN | 3 |
CHINA | 4 |
Data Inputs with sourcing, Market Event, Product Event, Country specific Forecast Model, Market uptake and patient share uptake, Attribute Analysis, Analog Analysis, Disease burden, and pricing scenario, Summary, and Insights.
1. Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) – Key Findings Summary |
1.1. Clinical findings |
1.1.1. Disease overview |
1.1.2. Therapeutic practices |
1.1.3. Future outlook |
1.2. Commercial findings |
1.2.1. Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) market scenario 2023 |
1.2.2. Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) market scenario 2028 |
1.2.3. Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) market scenario 2033 |
2. Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Overview |
2.1. Disease Introduction |
2.2. Pathophysiology |
2.3. Signs and Symptoms |
2.4. Risk Factors |
2.5. Etiology |
2.6. Classification |
2.7. Pathogenesis |
2.8. Diagnosis |
2.9. Complications |
2.10. Treatment Algorithm |
2.10.1. Treatment in US (guidelines) |
2.10.2. Treatment in EU-5 (guidelines) |
2.10.3. Treatment in Japan (guidelines) |
2.10.4. Treatment in China (guidelines) |
2.11. Treatment Goals for Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) |
2.12. Referral Patterns |
2.12.1. Referral Scenario in US |
2.12.2. Referral Scenario in EU-5 |
2.12.3. Referral Scenario in Japan |
2.12.4. Referral Scenario in China |
2.13. Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Prognosis |
2.14. Healthcare burden |
2.14.1. Healthcare burden in US |
2.14.2. Healthcare burden in EU-5 |
2.14.3. Healthcare burden in Japan |
2.14.4. Healthcare burden in China |
2.15. Unmet Needs in Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) management |
2.16. Market Opportunity for Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) |
2.17. KOL Comments on current and upcoming/expected treatment practices in Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) |
3. Epidemiology |
3.1. Epidemiology Overview |
3.2. Epidemiology by Geography |
3.2.1. Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Epidemiology in US (2023-2033) |
3.2.1.1. Incidence of Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) |
3.2.1.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.1.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.1.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.2. Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Epidemiology in EU-5 (2023-2033) |
3.2.2.1. Incidence of Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) |
3.2.2.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.2.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.2.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.3. Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Epidemiology in Japan (2023-2033) |
3.2.3.1. Incidence of Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) |
3.2.3.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.3.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.3.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.4. Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Epidemiology in China (2023-2033) |
3.2.4.1. Incidence of Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) |
3.2.4.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.4.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.4.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.3. Epidemiology Trends (World-wide) |
4. Market Outlook |
4.1. US Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Market Forecast 2023-2033 |
4.1.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.1.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.1.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.1.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.1.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.1.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.2. UK Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Market Forecast 2023-2033 |
4.2.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.2.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.2.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.2.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.2.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.2.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.3. France Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Market Forecast 2023-2033 |
4.3.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.3.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.3.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.3.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.3.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.3.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.4. Germany Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Market Forecast 2023-2033 |
4.4.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.4.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.4.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.4.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.4.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.4.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.5. Italy Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Market Forecast 2023-2033 |
4.5.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.5.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.5.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.5.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.5.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.5.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.6. Spain Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Market Forecast 2023-2033 |
4.6.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.6.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.6.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.6.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.6.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.6.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.7. Japan Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Market Forecast 2023-2033 |
4.7.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.7.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.7.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.7.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.7.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.7.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.8. China Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Market Forecast 2023-2033 |
4.8.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.8.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.8.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.8.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.8.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.8.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.9. Key Expected Milestones (world-wide) Impacting the Market |
5. Competitive Landscape |
5.1. Pipeline Therapies Overview |
5.1.1. Phase III Therapies |
5.1.1.1. Current Status |
5.1.1.2. Trial details, results |
5.1.1.3. Approval Timeline |
5.1.1.4. Likelihood of approval |
5.1.1.5. Expected Product Positioning |
5.1.1.2. All other Phase III Therapies ….. |
5.1.1.3. Attribute Analysis of Phase III molecules |
5.1.2. Phase II and Phase I/II Therapies |
5.1.2.1. Current Status |
5.1.2.2. Trial details, results |
5.1.2.3. Approval Timelines |
5.1.3. List of active Pre-clinical Therapies |
5.1.3.1. Status in Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) |
5.1.3.2. Company positioning |
5.1.3.2. All other pre-clinical therapies |
5.1.4. List of Inactive/discontinued assets |
5.1.4.1. Business impact of discontinuations on current pipeline |
5.1.5. Potential winners from Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Pipeline |
5.1.5.1. Potential Blockbusters across the pipeline |
6. Regulatory/Approval Scenario |
6.1. Regulatory/Approval Framework in US |
6.1.1. Policy Framework |
6.1.2. Payer Expectations |
6.2. Regulatory/Approval Framework in UK |
6.2.1. Policy Framework |
6.2.2. Payer Expectations |
6.3. Regulatory/Approval Framework in France |
6.3.1. Policy Framework |
6.3.2. Payer Expectations |
6.4. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Germany |
6.4.1. Policy Framework |
6.4.2. Payer Expectations |
6.5. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Italy |
6.5.1. Policy Framework |
6.5.2. Payer Expectations |
6.6. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Spain |
6.6.1. Policy Framework |
6.6.2. Payer Expectations |
6.7. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Japan |
6.7.1. Policy Framework |
6.7.2. Payer Expectations |
6.8. Regulatory/Approval Framework in China |
6.8.1. Policy Framework |
6.8.2. Payer Expectations |
7. Clinical Trial Assessment – Current and Future Paradigm |
7.1. Distribution of Primary Endpoints across trials |
7.2. Distribution of Secondary Endpoints across trials |
7.3. Evolution and acceptance of surrogate endpoints |
7.4. Key Investigator initiated trials |
7.5. Attrition analysis |
7.5.1. Suspended/Discontinued Assets |
7.5.2. Failed Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.5.3. Terminated Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.5.4. Withdrawn Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.6. Trial enrollment scenario and challenges |
7.7. Clinical Trial Guidance (across geographies) |
8. Thelansis Commentary |
8.1. Key Unmet needs in Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) |
8.2. Possible Best-case Clinical Trial Strategies |
8.3. Possible Best Case Targeted Product Profile (TPP) |
8.4. Possible Best-case Market positioning strategies |
8.5. Possible Best-case Market Access Strategies |
8.6. Possible Best-case LCM Strategies |
8.7. Overall View on Stiff-Person Syndrome (SPS) Market in Dollar Value |
9. Report Methodology |
9.1. Secondary research |
9.2. Primary research |
9.3. Data collation |
9.4. Insight Generation |
10. About Thelansis |
10.1. Our Capabilities |
10.2. Our Services |
10.3. Our Contacts |
10.4. Disclaimer |