Published Date : 2023-02-11
Published Date : 2023-02-11
Updated On : 2023-12-18
Pages : 154
Thelansis’s “Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Market Outlook, Epidemiology, Competitive Landscape, and Market Forecast Report – 2023 To 2033" covers disease overview, epidemiology, drug utilization, prescription share analysis, competitive landscape, clinical practice, regulatory landscape, patient share, market uptake, market forecast, and key market insights under the potential Sanfilippo Syndrome Type A treatment modalities options for eight major markets (USA, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, UK, Japan, and China).
Mucopolysaccharidosis type III (MPS III), part of the mucopolysaccharidoses group, is a lysosomal storage disease characterized by severe and rapid intellectual deterioration. Initial symptoms typically manifest between the ages of 2 and 6 years, presenting with behavioral disorders such as hyperkinesia and aggressiveness, along with intellectual decline, sleep disturbances, and mild dysmorphism. Neurological involvement becomes more pronounced around age 10, leading to losing motor milestones and communication difficulties. Seizures often occur after age 10; some attenuated forms have been reported. Each MPS III subtype (MPS IIIA, MPS IIIB, MPS IIIC, and MPS IIID) results from deficiencies in one of the four enzymes necessary for heparan sulfate (HS) degradation. Specific enzymes responsible for each subtype include heparan sulfamidase for MPS IIIA, alpha-N-acetylglucosaminidase for MPS IIIB, alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase for MPS IIIC, and N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulfate sulfatase for MPS IIID. The respective genes for these enzymes have been identified (MPS IIIA on 17q25, MPS IIIB on 17q21, MPS IIIC in the pericentromeric region of chromosome 8, MPS IIID on 12q14), with numerous associated mutations. Allogenic bone marrow grafts are contraindicated, as they do not impede mental deterioration, even in pre-symptomatically engrafted patients. Gene therapy is currently being investigated in animal models for MPS IIIA and MPS IIIB subtypes. The complex neurological degradation and multiple complications necessitate a multidisciplinary approach to provide tailored symptomatic treatment.
North America- the United States and Canada
Europe- EU5 (Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom)
Other countries- Japan & China
This section of the study covers country-specific current clinical practice, the standard of care, and significant limitations around addressing the unmet needs. Retrospective analysis and bench-marking of clinical study outcomes are presented in terms of Pre-treatment & post-treatment clinical and demographic patient characteristics. Essentially, this section will cover the evolution of the current competitive landscape and its impact on the future treatment paradigm.
KOLs across 8 MM markets from the center of Excellence/ Public/ Private hospitals participated in the study. Insights around current treatment landscape, epidemiology, clinical characteristics, future treatment paradigm, and Unmet needs
- Data Inputs with sourcing
- Market Event and Product Event
- Country-specific Forecast Model
- Market uptake and patient share uptake
- Attribute Analysis
- Analog Analysis
- Disease burden and pricing scenario
- Summary and Insights
Optimization of cash flow/ revenue flow concerning all fixed and variable investments throughout the product development process. The rate of return on an investment is a critical indicator to ensure the profitability and break-even of the project.
The competitive landscape includes country-specific approved as well as pipeline therapies. Any asset/product-specific designation or review such as Orphan drug designation, Fast track, Priority Review, Breakthrough Therapy Designation, Rare Pediatric Disease Designation, and Accelerated Approval are tracked and supplemented with analyst commentary.
Detailed clinical trial data analysis and critical product positioning include trial design, primary outcomes, secondary outcomes, dosing and schedules, inclusion and exclusion criteria, recruitment status and essentially covers the reported adverse events. Majorly the trial analysis helps determine the potential of the critical assets and their probable filing and launch date.
This report presents the most important clinical unmet needs in the treatment, according to Thelansis research and analysis. Other essential unmet needs identified through our study include decreased cost burden on patients, improved administration convenience, and improved patient compliance.
S. no | Asset | Company | Stage |
1 | DNL126 | Denali Therapeutics Inc. | Phase 1/2 |
2 | LYS-SAF302 | LYSOGENE | Phase 3 |
3 | JR-441 | JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. | Phase 1/2 |
4 | ABO-102 | Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc | Phase 3 |
5 | SOBI003 | Swedish Orphan Biovitrum | Phase 1/2 |
6 | rhHNS | Takeda | Phase 1/2 |
KOLs across 8 MM market from the center of Excellence/ Public/ Private hospitals participated in the study. Insights around current treatment landscape, epidemiology, clinical characteristics, future treatment paradigm, and Unmet needs.
COUNTRY | No. Of KOLs |
USA | 17 |
GERMANY | 4 |
UK | 4 |
SPAIN | 3 |
FRANCE | 2 |
ITALY | 3 |
JAPAN | 3 |
CHINA | 4 |
Data Inputs with sourcing, Market Event, Product Event, Country specific Forecast Model, Market uptake and patient share uptake, Attribute Analysis, Analog Analysis, Disease burden, and pricing scenario, Summary, and Insights.
1. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) – Key Findings Summary |
1.1. Clinical findings |
1.1.1. Disease overview |
1.1.2. Therapeutic practices |
1.1.3. Future outlook |
1.2. Commercial findings |
1.2.1. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) market scenario 2023 |
1.2.2. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) market scenario 2028 |
1.2.3. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) market scenario 2033 |
2. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Overview |
2.1. Disease Introduction |
2.2. Pathophysiology |
2.3. Signs and Symptoms |
2.4. Risk Factors |
2.5. Etiology |
2.6. Classification |
2.7. Pathogenesis |
2.8. Diagnosis |
2.9. Complications |
2.10. Treatment Algorithm |
2.10.1. Treatment in US (guidelines) |
2.10.2. Treatment in EU-5 (guidelines) |
2.10.3. Treatment in Japan (guidelines) |
2.10.4. Treatment in China (guidelines) |
2.11. Treatment Goals for Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) |
2.12. Referral Patterns |
2.12.1. Referral Scenario in US |
2.12.2. Referral Scenario in EU-5 |
2.12.3. Referral Scenario in Japan |
2.12.4. Referral Scenario in China |
2.13. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Prognosis |
2.14. Healthcare burden |
2.14.1. Healthcare burden in US |
2.14.2. Healthcare burden in EU-5 |
2.14.3. Healthcare burden in Japan |
2.14.4. Healthcare burden in China |
2.15. Unmet Needs in Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) management |
2.16. Market Opportunity for Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) |
2.17. KOL Comments on current and upcoming/expected treatment practices in Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) |
3. Epidemiology |
3.1. Epidemiology Overview |
3.2. Epidemiology by Geography |
3.2.1. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Epidemiology in US (2023-2033) |
3.2.1.1. Incidence of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) |
3.2.1.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.1.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.1.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.2. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Epidemiology in EU-5 (2023-2033) |
3.2.2.1. Incidence of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) |
3.2.2.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.2.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.2.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.3. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Epidemiology in Japan (2023-2033) |
3.2.3.1. Incidence of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) |
3.2.3.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.3.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.3.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.4. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Epidemiology in China (2023-2033) |
3.2.4.1. Incidence of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) |
3.2.4.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.4.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.4.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.3. Epidemiology Trends (World-wide) |
4. Market Outlook |
4.1. US Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Market Forecast 2023-2033 |
4.1.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.1.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.1.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.1.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.1.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.1.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.2. UK Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Market Forecast 2023-2033 |
4.2.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.2.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.2.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.2.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.2.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.2.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.3. France Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Market Forecast 2023-2033 |
4.3.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.3.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.3.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.3.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.3.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.3.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.4. Germany Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Market Forecast 2023-2033 |
4.4.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.4.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.4.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.4.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.4.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.4.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.5. Italy Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Market Forecast 2023-2033 |
4.5.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.5.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.5.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.5.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.5.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.5.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.6. Spain Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Market Forecast 2023-2033 |
4.6.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.6.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.6.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.6.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.6.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.6.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.7. Japan Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Market Forecast 2023-2033 |
4.7.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.7.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.7.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.7.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.7.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.7.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.8. China Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Market Forecast 2023-2033 |
4.8.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.8.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.8.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.8.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.8.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.8.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.9. Key Expected Milestones (world-wide) Impacting the Market |
5. Competitive Landscape |
5.1. Pipeline Therapies Overview |
5.1.1. Phase III Therapies |
5.1.1.1. Current Status |
5.1.1.2. Trial details, results |
5.1.1.3. Approval Timeline |
5.1.1.4. Likelihood of approval |
5.1.1.5. Expected Product Positioning |
5.1.1.2. All other Phase III Therapies ….. |
5.1.1.3. Attribute Analysis of Phase III molecules |
5.1.2. Phase II and Phase I/II Therapies |
5.1.2.1. Current Status |
5.1.2.2. Trial details, results |
5.1.2.3. Approval Timelines |
5.1.3. List of active Pre-clinical Therapies |
5.1.3.1. Status in Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) |
5.1.3.2. Company positioning |
5.1.3.2. All other pre-clinical therapies |
5.1.4. List of Inactive/discontinued assets |
5.1.4.1. Business impact of discontinuations on current pipeline |
5.1.5. Potential winners from Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Pipeline |
5.1.5.1. Potential Blockbusters across the pipeline |
6. Regulatory/Approval Scenario |
6.1. Regulatory/Approval Framework in US |
6.1.1. Policy Framework |
6.1.2. Payer Expectations |
6.2. Regulatory/Approval Framework in UK |
6.2.1. Policy Framework |
6.2.2. Payer Expectations |
6.3. Regulatory/Approval Framework in France |
6.3.1. Policy Framework |
6.3.2. Payer Expectations |
6.4. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Germany |
6.4.1. Policy Framework |
6.4.2. Payer Expectations |
6.5. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Italy |
6.5.1. Policy Framework |
6.5.2. Payer Expectations |
6.6. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Spain |
6.6.1. Policy Framework |
6.6.2. Payer Expectations |
6.7. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Japan |
6.7.1. Policy Framework |
6.7.2. Payer Expectations |
6.8. Regulatory/Approval Framework in China |
6.8.1. Policy Framework |
6.8.2. Payer Expectations |
7. Clinical Trial Assessment – Current and Future Paradigm |
7.1. Distribution of Primary Endpoints across trials |
7.2. Distribution of Secondary Endpoints across trials |
7.3. Evolution and acceptance of surrogate endpoints |
7.4. Key Investigator initiated trials |
7.5. Attrition analysis |
7.5.1. Suspended/Discontinued Assets |
7.5.2. Failed Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.5.3. Terminated Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.5.4. Withdrawn Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.6. Trial enrollment scenario and challenges |
7.7. Clinical Trial Guidance (across geographies) |
8. Thelansis Commentary |
8.1. Key Unmet needs in Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) |
8.2. Possible Best-case Clinical Trial Strategies |
8.3. Possible Best Case Targeted Product Profile (TPP) |
8.4. Possible Best-case Market positioning strategies |
8.5. Possible Best-case Market Access Strategies |
8.6. Possible Best-case LCM Strategies |
8.7. Overall View on Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA (MPS IIIA) Market in Dollar Value |
9. Report Methodology |
9.1. Secondary research |
9.2. Primary research |
9.3. Data collation |
9.4. Insight Generation |
10. About Thelansis |
10.1. Our Capabilities |
10.2. Our Services |
10.3. Our Contacts |
10.4. Disclaimer |