Published Date : 2022-09-06
Published Date : 2022-09-06
Updated On : 2023-07-02
Pages : 150
Thelansis’s “IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Market Outlook, Epidemiology, Competitive Landscape, and Market Forecast Report – 2022 To 2032" covers disease overview, epidemiology, drug utilization, prescription share analysis, competitive landscape, clinical practice, regulatory landscape, patient share, market uptake, market forecast, and key market insights under the potential IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes treatment modalities options for eight major markets (USA, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, UK, Japan, and China).
The gene Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) encodes the protein isocitrate dehydrogenase 1, an enzymatic component of the citric acid cycle. This enzyme facilitates the carboxylation process of isocitrate, leading to alpha-ketoglutarate formation. Recurrent mutations in the IDH1 gene have been observed in 12% of glioblastoma patients and 70% of patients diagnosed with WHO grade II and III astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. Within these contexts, the IDH1 mutations target a specific amino acid residue at position 132, causing a substitution from arginine to histidine (R132H). The clinical significance of IDH1 mutations in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) remains inadequately understood. The IDH1 enzyme is synthesized based on the genetic instructions present in the IDH1 gene, located on chromosome 2q33.3. The enzyme is situated in both the cytoplasm and peroxisomes. Ordinarily, the IDH1 gene encodes an enzyme reliant on NADPH that facilitates the transformation of isocitrate into alpha-ketoglutarate. In the presence of IDH1 mutations, the enzyme's functionality is altered, producing the oncometabolite D2HG and subsequent accumulation. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the most frequently identified IDH1 mutation occurs at the Arg132 residue (R132). This alteration results in substituting the substrate-binding arginine with residues such as R132H, R132C, R132G, R132L, or R132S in the catalytic domain of the enzyme. The outcomes of R132 IDH1 mutations include DNA and histone hypermethylation and a hindrance in cellular differentiation, indicating the presence of leukemogenic myeloid progenitor cells. Both IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are correlated with older age and an unfavorable prognosis, particularly in AML cases characterized by a cytogenetically normal karyotype (CN-AML). Various other factors are associated with IDH1 mutations, including intermediate-risk cytogenetics, elevated platelet counts, higher percentages of bone marrow blasts during diagnosis, mutations in FLT3-ITD and NPM1, and, in rare instances, mutations linked to therapy-related AML, TET2, and WT1. Multiple methodologies, such as Sanger sequencing, PCR-based techniques, and next-generation sequencing (NGS), are employed to identify IDH mutations in patients with hematologic malignancies. Patients with IDH1-mutated relapsed or refractory MDS currently have no targeted therapy options, and outcomes are generally poor for those who experience disease progression after treatment with standard care.
North America- the United States and Canada
Europe- EU5 (Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom)
Other countries- Japan & China
This section of the study covers country-specific current clinical practice, the standard of care, and significant limitations around addressing the unmet needs. Retrospective analysis and bench-marking of clinical study outcomes are presented in terms of Pre-treatment & post-treatment clinical and demographic patient characteristics. Essentially, this section will cover the evolution of the current competitive landscape and its impact on the future treatment paradigm.
KOLs across 8 MM markets from the center of Excellence/ Public/ Private hospitals participated in the study. Insights around current treatment landscape, epidemiology, clinical characteristics, future treatment paradigm, and Unmet needs
- Data Inputs with sourcing
- Market Event and Product Event
- Country-specific Forecast Model
- Market uptake and patient share uptake
- Attribute Analysis
- Analog Analysis
- Disease burden and pricing scenario
- Summary and Insights
Optimization of cash flow/ revenue flow concerning all fixed and variable investments throughout the product development process. The rate of return on an investment is a critical indicator to ensure the profitability and break-even of the project.
The competitive landscape includes country-specific approved as well as pipeline therapies. Any asset/product-specific designation or review such as Orphan drug designation, Fast track, Priority Review, Breakthrough Therapy Designation, Rare Pediatric Disease Designation, and Accelerated Approval are tracked and supplemented with analyst commentary.
Detailed clinical trial data analysis and critical product positioning include trial design, primary outcomes, secondary outcomes, dosing and schedules, inclusion and exclusion criteria, recruitment status and essentially covers the reported adverse events. Majorly the trial analysis helps determine the potential of the critical assets and their probable filing and launch date.
This report presents the most important clinical unmet needs in the treatment, according to Thelansis research and analysis. Other essential unmet needs identified through our study include decreased cost burden on patients, improved administration convenience, and improved patient compliance.
S. no | Asset | Company | Stage |
1 | TIBSOVO® (ivosidenib tablets) | Servier | Phase 1 |
KOLs across 8 MM market from the center of Excellence/ Public/ Private hospitals participated in the study. Insights around current treatment landscape, epidemiology, clinical characteristics, future treatment paradigm, and Unmet needs.
COUNTRY | No. Of KOLs |
USA | 17 |
GERMANY | 4 |
UK | 4 |
SPAIN | 3 |
FRANCE | 2 |
ITALY | 3 |
JAPAN | 3 |
CHINA | 4 |
Data Inputs with sourcing, Market Event, Product Event, Country specific Forecast Model, Market uptake and patient share uptake, Attribute Analysis, Analog Analysis, Disease burden, and pricing scenario, Summary, and Insights.
1. IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) – Key Findings Summary |
1.1. Clinical findings |
1.1.1. Disease overview |
1.1.2. Therapeutic practices |
1.1.3. Future outlook |
1.2. Commercial findings |
1.2.1. IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) market scenario 2022 |
1.2.2. IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) market scenario 2025 |
1.2.3. IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) market scenario 2032 |
2. IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Overview |
2.1. Disease Introduction |
2.2. Pathophysiology |
2.3. Signs and Symptoms |
2.4. Risk Factors |
2.5. Etiology |
2.6. Classification |
2.7. Pathogenesis |
2.8. Diagnosis |
2.9. Complications |
2.10. Treatment Algorithm |
2.10.1. Treatment in US (guidelines) |
2.10.2. Treatment in EU-5 (guidelines) |
2.10.3. Treatment in Japan (guidelines) |
2.10.4. Treatment in China (guidelines) |
2.11. Treatment Goals for IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) |
2.12. Referral Patterns |
2.12.1. Referral Scenario in US |
2.12.2. Referral Scenario in EU-5 |
2.12.3. Referral Scenario in Japan |
2.12.4. Referral Scenario in China |
2.13. IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Prognosis |
2.14. Healthcare burden |
2.14.1. Healthcare burden in US |
2.14.2. Healthcare burden in EU-5 |
2.14.3. Healthcare burden in Japan |
2.14.4. Healthcare burden in China |
2.15. Unmet Needs in IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) management |
2.16. Market Opportunity for IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) |
2.17. KOL Comments on current and upcoming/expected treatment practices in IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) |
3. Epidemiology |
3.1. Epidemiology Overview |
3.2. Epidemiology by Geography |
3.2.1. IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Epidemiology in US (2022-2032) |
3.2.1.1. Incidence of IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) |
3.2.1.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.1.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.1.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.2. IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Epidemiology in EU-5 (2022-2032) |
3.2.2.1. Incidence of IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) |
3.2.2.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.2.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.2.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.3. IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Epidemiology in Japan (2022-2032) |
3.2.3.1. Incidence of IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) |
3.2.3.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.3.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.3.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.4. IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Epidemiology in China (2022-2032) |
3.2.4.1. Incidence of IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) |
3.2.4.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.4.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.4.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.3. Epidemiology Trends (World-wide) |
4. Market Outlook |
4.1. US IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Market Forecast 2022-2032 |
4.1.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.1.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.1.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.1.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.1.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.1.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.2. UK IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Market Forecast 2022-2032 |
4.2.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.2.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.2.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.2.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.2.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.2.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.3. France IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Market Forecast 2022-2032 |
4.3.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.3.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.3.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.3.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.3.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.3.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.4. Germany IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Market Forecast 2022-2032 |
4.4.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.4.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.4.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.4.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.4.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.4.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.5. Italy IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Market Forecast 2022-2032 |
4.5.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.5.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.5.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.5.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.5.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.5.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.6. Spain IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Market Forecast 2022-2032 |
4.6.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.6.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.6.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.6.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.6.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.6.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.7. Japan IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Market Forecast 2022-2032 |
4.7.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.7.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.7.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.7.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.7.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.7.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.8. China IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Market Forecast 2022-2032 |
4.8.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.8.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.8.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.8.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.8.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.8.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.9. Key Expected Milestones (world-wide) Impacting the Market |
5. Competitive Landscape |
5.1. Pipeline Therapies Overview |
5.1.1. Phase III Therapies |
5.1.1.1. Current Status |
5.1.1.2. Trial details, results |
5.1.1.3. Approval Timeline |
5.1.1.4. Likelihood of approval |
5.1.1.5. Expected Product Positioning |
5.1.1.2. All other Phase III Therapies ….. |
5.1.1.3. Attribute Analysis of Phase III molecules |
5.1.2. Phase II and Phase I/II Therapies |
5.1.2.1. Current Status |
5.1.2.2. Trial details, results |
5.1.2.3. Approval Timelines |
5.1.3. List of active Pre-clinical Therapies |
5.1.3.1. Status in IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) |
5.1.3.2. Company positioning |
5.1.3.2. All other pre-clinical therapies |
5.1.4. List of Inactive/discontinued assets |
5.1.4.1. Business impact of discontinuations on current pipeline |
5.1.5. Potential winners from IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Pipeline |
5.1.5.1. Potential Blockbusters across the pipeline |
6. Regulatory/Approval Scenario |
6.1. Regulatory/Approval Framework in US |
6.1.1. Policy Framework |
6.1.2. Payer Expectations |
6.2. Regulatory/Approval Framework in UK |
6.2.1. Policy Framework |
6.2.2. Payer Expectations |
6.3. Regulatory/Approval Framework in France |
6.3.1. Policy Framework |
6.3.2. Payer Expectations |
6.4. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Germany |
6.4.1. Policy Framework |
6.4.2. Payer Expectations |
6.5. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Italy |
6.5.1. Policy Framework |
6.5.2. Payer Expectations |
6.6. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Spain |
6.6.1. Policy Framework |
6.6.2. Payer Expectations |
6.7. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Japan |
6.7.1. Policy Framework |
6.7.2. Payer Expectations |
6.8. Regulatory/Approval Framework in China |
6.8.1. Policy Framework |
6.8.2. Payer Expectations |
7. Clinical Trial Assessment – Current and Future Paradigm |
7.1. Distribution of Primary Endpoints across trials |
7.2. Distribution of Secondary Endpoints across trials |
7.3. Evolution and acceptance of surrogate endpoints |
7.4. Key Investigator initiated trials |
7.5. Attrition analysis |
7.5.1. Suspended/Discontinued Assets |
7.5.2. Failed Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.5.3. Terminated Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.5.4. Withdrawn Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.6. Trial enrollment scenario and challenges |
7.7. Clinical Trial Guidance (across geographies) |
8. Thelansis Commentary |
8.1. Key Unmet needs in IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) |
8.2. Possible Best-case Clinical Trial Strategies |
8.3. Possible Best Case Targeted Product Profile (TPP) |
8.4. Possible Best-case Market positioning strategies |
8.5. Possible Best-case Market Access Strategies |
8.6. Possible Best-case LCM Strategies |
8.7. Overall View on IDH1-mutated Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Market in Dollar Value |
9. Report Methodology |
9.1. Secondary research |
9.2. Primary research |
9.3. Data collation |
9.4. Insight Generation |
10. About Thelansis |
10.1. Our Capabilities |
10.2. Our Services |
10.3. Our Contacts |
10.4. Disclaimer |