Published Date : 2021-12-27
Published Date : 2021-12-27
Updated On : 2022-09-08
Pages : 151
Thelansis’s “Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Market Outlook, Epidemiology, Competitive Landscape, and Market Forecast Report – 2021 To 2032" covers disease overview, epidemiology, drug utilization, prescription share analysis, Competitive landscape, clinical practice, regulatory landscape, patient share, market uptake, and market forecast under the potential Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 treatment modalities options for eight major markets (USA, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, UK, Japan, and China).
Autosomal dominant osteopetrosis type 2 is characterized by segmentary osteosclerosis, predominantly at the vertebral endplates, iliac wings, and skull base. Clinical manifestations include cranial nerve palsies, osteoarthritis of the hip, mandibular osteomyelitis, and nontraumatic fractures, particularly of the long bones. OPTA2 is responsible for 70% of autosomal dominant osteopetrosis cases. Symptoms and severity can vary greatly, ranging from the neonatal onset with life-threatening complications to the incidental finding of osteopetrosis on X-ray. Depending on the severity and age of onset, features may include fractures, short stature, compressive neuropathies, hypocalcemia with attendant tetanic seizures, and life-threatening pancytopenia. There may be neurological impairment or involvement of other body systems in rare cases. Osteopetrosis is classified based on clinical features, mode of inheritance and molecular mechanism. There are various clinical features and genes involved in different types of osteopetrosis. Inheritance type can be autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant or X-linked. Autosomal recessive osteopetrosis (ARO), a malignant form of osteopetrosis that can be seen in infancy, can result in growth failure and increased frequency of fractures.
North America- the United States and Canada
Europe- EU5 (Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom)
Other countries- Japan & China
This section of the study covers country-specific current clinical practice, the standard of care, and significant limitations around addressing the unmet needs. Retrospective analysis and bench-marking of clinical study outcomes are presented in terms of Pre-treatment & post-treatment clinical and demographic patient characteristics. Essentially, this section will cover the evolution of the current competitive landscape and its impact on the future treatment paradigm.
KOLs across 8 MM markets from the center of Excellence/ Public/ Private hospitals participated in the study. Insights around current treatment landscape, epidemiology, clinical characteristics, future treatment paradigm, and Unmet needs
- Data Inputs with sourcing
- Market Event and Product Event
- Country-specific Forecast Model
- Market uptake and patient share uptake
- Attribute Analysis
- Analog Analysis
- Disease burden and pricing scenario
- Summary and Insights
Optimization of cash flow/ revenue flow concerning all fixed and variable investments throughout the product development process. The rate of return on an investment is a critical indicator to ensure the profitability and break-even of the project.
The competitive landscape includes country-specific approved as well as pipeline therapies. Any asset/product-specific designation or review such as Orphan drug designation, Fast track, Priority Review, Breakthrough Therapy Designation, Rare Pediatric Disease Designation, and Accelerated Approval are tracked and supplemented with analyst commentary.
Detailed clinical trial data analysis and critical product positioning include trial design, primary outcomes, secondary outcomes, dosing and schedules, inclusion and exclusion criteria, recruitment status and essentially covers the reported adverse events. Majorly the trial analysis helps determine the potential of the critical assets and their probable filing and launch date.
This report presents the most important clinical unmet needs in the treatment, according to Thelansis research and analysis. Other essential unmet needs identified through our study include decreased cost burden on patients, improved administration convenience, and improved patient compliance.
S. no | Asset | Company | Stage |
1 | ACTIMMUNE | Horizon Pharma Ireland, Ltd., Dublin Ireland | Phase 2 |
2 | SIS-101-ADO | SiSaf Ltd | Phase 1 |
KOLs across 8 MM markets from the center of Excellence/ Public/ Private hospitals participated in the study. Insights around current treatment landscape, epidemiology, clinical characteristics, future treatment paradigm, and Unmet needs.
COUNTRY | No. Of KOLs |
USA | 17 |
GERMANY | 4 |
UK | 5 |
SPAIN | 4 |
FRANCE | 4 |
ITALY | 4 |
JAPAN | 5 |
CHINA | 5 |
Data Inputs with sourcing, Market Event, Product Event, Country specific Forecast Model, Market uptake and patient share uptake, Attribute Analysis, Analog Analysis, Disease burden, and pricing scenario, Summary, and Insights.
1. Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 – Key Findings Summary |
1.1. Clinical findings |
1.1.1. Disease overview |
1.1.2. Therapeutic practices |
1.1.3. Future outlook |
1.2. Commercial findings |
1.2.1. Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 market scenario 2021 |
1.2.2. Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 market scenario 2025 |
1.2.3. Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 market scenario 2032 |
2. Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Overview |
2.1. Disease Introduction |
2.2. Pathophysiology |
2.3. Signs and Symptoms |
2.4. Risk Factors |
2.5. Etiology |
2.6. Classification |
2.7. Pathogenesis |
2.8. Diagnosis |
2.9. Complications |
2.10. Treatment Algorithm |
2.10.1. Treatment in US (guidelines) |
2.10.2. Treatment in EU-5 (guidelines) |
2.10.3. Treatment in Japan (guidelines) |
2.10.4. Treatment in China (guidelines) |
2.11. Treatment Goals for Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 |
2.12. Referral Patterns |
2.12.1. Referral Scenario in US |
2.12.2. Referral Scenario in EU-5 |
2.12.3. Referral Scenario in Japan |
2.12.4. Referral Scenario in China |
2.13. Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Prognosis |
2.14. Healthcare burden |
2.14.1. Healthcare burden in US |
2.14.2. Healthcare burden in EU-5 |
2.14.3. Healthcare burden in Japan |
2.14.4. Healthcare burden in China |
2.15. Unmet Needs in Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 management |
2.16. Market Opportunity for Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 |
2.17. KOL Comments on current and upcoming/expected treatment practices in Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 |
3. Epidemiology |
3.1. Epidemiology Overview |
3.2. Epidemiology by Geography |
3.2.1. Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Epidemiology in US (2021-2032) |
3.2.1.1. Incidence of Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 |
3.2.1.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.1.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.1.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.2. Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Epidemiology in EU-5 (2021-2032) |
3.2.2.1. Incidence of Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 |
3.2.2.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.2.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.2.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.3. Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Epidemiology in Japan (2021-2032) |
3.2.3.1. Incidence of Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 |
3.2.3.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.3.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.3.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.2.4. Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Epidemiology in China (2021-2032) |
3.2.4.1. Incidence of Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 |
3.2.4.2. Diagnosed cases |
3.2.4.3. Treatable Patient Pool |
3.2.4.4. Epidemiology Trends |
3.3. Epidemiology Trends (World-wide) |
4. Market Outlook |
4.1. US Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.1.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.1.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.1.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.1.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.1.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.1.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.2. UK Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.2.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.2.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.2.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.2.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.2.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.2.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.3. France Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.3.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.3.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.3.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.3.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.3.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.3.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.4. Germany Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.4.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.4.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.4.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.4.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.4.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.4.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.5. Italy Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.5.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.5.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.5.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.5.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.5.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.5.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.6. Spain Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.6.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.6.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.6.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.6.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.6.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.6.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.7. Japan Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.7.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.7.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.7.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.7.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.7.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.7.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.8. China Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Market Forecast 2021-2032 |
4.8.1. Market Progression (Futuristic) |
4.8.2. Market Trends and Expectations |
4.8.2.1. Worst case scenario |
4.8.2.2. Base Case Scenario |
4.8.2.3. Best Case Scenario |
4.8.3. Drivers and Barriers |
4.9. Key Expected Milestones (world-wide) Impacting the Market |
5. Competitive Landscape |
5.1. Pipeline Therapies Overview |
5.1.1. Phase III Therapies |
5.1.1.1. Current Status |
5.1.1.2. Trial details, results |
5.1.1.3. Approval Timeline |
5.1.1.4. Likelihood of approval |
5.1.1.5. Expected Product Positioning |
5.1.1.2. All other Phase III Therapies ….. |
5.1.1.3. Attribute Analysis of Phase III molecules |
5.1.2. Phase II and Phase I/II Therapies |
5.1.2.1. Current Status |
5.1.2.2. Trial details, results |
5.1.2.3. Approval Timelines |
5.1.3. List of active Pre-clinical Therapies |
5.1.3.1. Status in Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 |
5.1.3.2. Company positioning |
5.1.3.2. All other pre-clinical therapies |
5.1.4. List of Inactive/discontinued assets |
5.1.4.1. Business impact of discontinuations on current pipeline |
5.1.5. Potential winners from Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Pipeline |
5.1.5.1. Potential Blockbusters across the pipeline |
6. Regulatory/Approval Scenario |
6.1. Regulatory/Approval Framework in US |
6.1.1. Policy Framework |
6.1.2. Payer Expectations |
6.2. Regulatory/Approval Framework in UK |
6.2.1. Policy Framework |
6.2.2. Payer Expectations |
6.3. Regulatory/Approval Framework in France |
6.3.1. Policy Framework |
6.3.2. Payer Expectations |
6.4. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Germany |
6.4.1. Policy Framework |
6.4.2. Payer Expectations |
6.5. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Italy |
6.5.1. Policy Framework |
6.5.2. Payer Expectations |
6.6. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Spain |
6.6.1. Policy Framework |
6.6.2. Payer Expectations |
6.7. Regulatory/Approval Framework in Japan |
6.7.1. Policy Framework |
6.7.2. Payer Expectations |
6.8. Regulatory/Approval Framework in China |
6.8.1. Policy Framework |
6.8.2. Payer Expectations |
7. Clinical Trial Assessment – Current and Future Paradigm |
7.1. Distribution of Primary Endpoints across trials |
7.2. Distribution of Secondary Endpoints across trials |
7.3. Evolution and acceptance of surrogate endpoints |
7.4. Key Investigator initiated trials |
7.5. Attrition analysis |
7.5.1. Suspended/Discontinued Assets |
7.5.2. Failed Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.5.3. Terminated Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.5.4. Withdrawn Trials, Reasons and Business Impact |
7.6. Trial enrollment scenario and challenges |
7.7. Clinical Trial Guidance (across geographies) |
8. Thelansis Commentary |
8.1. Key Unmet needs in Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 |
8.2. Possible Best-case Clinical Trial Strategies |
8.3. Possible Best Case Targeted Product Profile (TPP) |
8.4. Possible Best-case Market positioning strategies |
8.5. Possible Best-case Market Access Strategies |
8.6. Possible Best-case LCM Strategies |
8.7. Overall View on Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis Type 2 Market in Dollar Value |
9. Report Methodology |
9.1. Secondary research |
9.2. Primary research |
9.3. Data collation |
9.4. Insight Generation |
10. About Thelansis |
10.1. Our Capabilities |
10.2. Our Services |
10.3. Our Contacts |
10.4. Disclaimer |